Antonio Canova’s Pauline Borghese: Marble Venus and Imperial Ego

(Or: How to be naked and maintain imperial nonchalance)

Pauline Borghese as Venus Victrix by Canova, reclining marble sculpture at Galleria Borghese

Artist: Antonio Canova (1757-1822)

Date: 1804–1808

Material: Carrara marble

Dimensions: 92 × 200 cm

Location: Borghese Gallery, Rome

Client: Camillo Borghese

My rating : 10/10

There’s a moment, upon entering the Borghese Gallery, when the silence becomes theatrical. Not because of the sacredness of the art, but because of embarrassment. Everyone knows that there, in the center of the room, a half-naked woman—more alive than certain influencers—lies on a marble triclinium. It is Paolina Bonaparte Borghese, sculpted by Antonio Canova between 1804 and 1808, the “Venus Victorious.” Many ladies proceed directly to the next room, annoyed by such unparalleled sensuality, many gentlemen linger longer than necessary, and a few priests passing from the Vatican observe indifferently, finding the subject decidedly too old-fashioned.

The work caused a veritable scandal in apostolic Rome, overwhelmed by the new Napoleonic customs, because yes, it was indeed Pauline herself who was being portrayed. In flesh, blood, and above all, marble.

Canova's Pauline Borghese as Venus Victrix, reclining marble sculpture at the Borghese Gallery, Rome

1. A marble at the service of power (and the imperial ego)

The context is Napoleonic, and that explains everything: decorum is a facade, glory a family affair. Pauline Bonaparte, sister of the most famous Corsican emperor of all time, had married Camillo Borghese, a Roman patrician, more ancient than virile, in 1803.

Canova, called upon to portray her, faced a dilemma: how to reconcile neoclassical chastity with a model who loved provocation more than a libertine novel? Imagine a Paris Hilton or a Kim Kardashian of the Enlightenment, with a little more culture and grace. The solution was brilliant: Pauline is not Pauline, but Venus Victrix. A perfectly Napoleonic mythological role-playing game. Bourgeois immortality depended on sublimated flesh, and Canova knew it.

The work was created for the Villa Borghese on the Pincian Hill, and from the beginning it was perceived as a scandal. Chronicles tell that Paolina, when asked if she had actually posed nude, responded with the candor of an enlightened mythomaniac:

“Oh, of course! Canova had a stove in his studio.”

Others say that when asked the same question in a more mischievous tone, Paolina replied that yes, she had posed nude in front of Canova and, adding with a hint of politically incorrect commiseration and poorly concealed disappointment, that the artist “was not a real man“.

Again, it is said, that Canova’s first idea was to represent Pauline as Diana the Huntress, but Pauline, at the thought of being represented as a virgin, burst into uncontrollable laughter.

We are in Rome in the early 19th century; the Papal States still play their historic geopolitical role, even though they have been overwhelmed by the Jacobin tsunami; Roman high society is made up of noble and patrician families who all have, or have had, a pope, a bishop, or a cardinal in their family; the names are the high-sounding ones of the Farnese, Colonna, Borghese, Aldobrandini, Barberini, all plastered in a thick blanket of mold; the Council of Trent and the underwear affixed to Michelangelo’s nudes in the Sistine Chapel are more a thing of the past than of history; pedophilia had yet to be introduced into the catechism curriculum; Napoleon’s troops descend on Rome, mounting 200W amplifiers on their wagons, blasting suburban rap and the soundtrack to Mathieu Kassovitz’s “Hate.” At the head of the conquering army, Paolina, like Marianne, douses the soldiers with bottles of champagne like a victorious Formula 1 driver. Her breasts in the wind, she points the way to the troops with her turgid, directional nipples. How I wish I could have been there…

Scroll to Top